Crabtree v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1DissentDarden, Judge
I would respectfully dissent from the portion of the majority's decision with regard to the existence of a reasonable suspicion to justify the investigatory stop. I believe that Officer Stout's equivocal testimony, including his admission of an inability to recall the timing of the sequence of the events, especially the drawing of his weapon to force Crabtree's compliance with his requests, together with his admission that Crabtree's actions were consistent with legal activity, forecloses a determination that the investigatory stop was supported by a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. Kenneth BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Washington v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Lockett v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.