Legal Opinion

MATTER OF ROEHNER v. Gracie Manor

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 8, 1959PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.

We agree with the Appellate Division that ordinarily the sale by a real estate corporation of its sole asset is not outside the regular course of business so as to require stockholder consent (Stock Corporation Law, § 20; Eisen v. Post, 3 N Y 2d 518). The reason for this principle ceases to apply, however, where as is here alleged such sale is pursuant to a prior plan of corporate dissolution. Eisen v. Post (supra) did not hold to the contrary, since the majority opinion there was predicated upon the presumptive continuation of the corporation in business.

While normally petitioner would be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Matter of TimmisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Posner v. Post Road Development Equity, L. L. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Soho Gold, Inc. v. 33 Rector Street Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Cara Associates, L.L.C. v. MilsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Cara Associates, L.L.C. v. MilsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  5. In Re Eadie Properties, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API