Legal Opinion

Reinhold v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The sole question here is whether there is substantial evidence to sustain a finding by the commission that plaintiff more than two years prior to her application knew or ought to have known the nature of her disability and its relation to her employment. If there is, then plaintiff’s claim for compensation is barred by the provisions of sec. 102.12, Stats., because there was “no application filed with the commission within two years from the date . . . the employee . . . knew or ought to have known the nature of the disability and its relation to the employment. . . . This necessitates an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Trustees, Middle River Sanatorium v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Fresno v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. Consolidation Coal Co. v. DuganCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Bassett-McGregor v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Rastella v. State Department of Public WorksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  5. Boudreau v. American Luggage Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API