Taylor v. Cady
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment dismissing his complaint for personal injuries. The trial court determined that both plaintiff and defendant, Laurence W. Cady, were acting within the scope of their duties as employees of a common employer and, therefore, the action is barred by RCW 51.24.010. Plaintiff assigns error to this determination. We affirm.
At the time of the injury, plaintiff and defendant were both employed by Garrett Freight Lines, Inc., in Yakima. Plaintiff was a truck driver for the company. Defendant, the manager of the terminal office, was a salaried employee…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Olson v. SternWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Hamilton v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1969
3Cited by10 opinions
- Evans v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Bolden v. State Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Bergsma v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- Heim v. Longview Fibre Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- Orris v. LingleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.