Legal Opinion

Chaffin v. Dixon

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1920PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Fayette county.

1Opinion of the CourtShohl, P. J.

Solomon Chaffin, the father of the parties, died in March, 1914, leaving a will whereby he devised the premises in controversy in the following language:

Item 1. ‘T give and devise to my son Franklin A. Chaffin, during his natural life, and then to the heirs of his body forever, the following described real estate, situate in the County of Fayette; State of Ohio.”

The will contained no residuary clause and made no disposition of the premises except the foregoing.

Solomon Chaffin left surviving him four children, one of whom was Franklin. Franklin A. Chaffin was childless at the death of his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Carver v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
  2. Doe v. ConsidineSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  3. Mansfield & Sandusky City Rail Road v. John P. Veeder & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1848
  4. Leopold v. WeaverOhio Court of Appeals · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Merchant v. AdairOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Bollar v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023
  3. Buchheit v. O'MalleyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023
  4. Elizabeth B.W. v. SSA Commissioner, et al.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
  5. Hale v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API