Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Gilbert

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 20, 1988No. ACMR 8700453Published

1DissentDe Giulio, Senior Judge

On direct examination appellant testified that he had been in the Drug and Alcohol program, that he had successfully completed it, and that it taught him that drugs and alcohol were not the answer to his problem. During cross-examination the following colloquy occurred:

Q: Private First Class Gilbert, you had talked to several people with regard to your offense including First Sergeant Peterson and Master Sergeant Baker, hadn’t you.

*804A: Yes, sir.

DC: Objection. I believe it is beyond the scope, sir.

MJ: Not necessarily. I’ll allow it until we find out what were [sic] doing.

Q: And, isn’t it true…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. BookerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. MathewsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  4. United States v. HarrodU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. SpiveyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API