Legal Opinion

Byrd v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1987No. 50579PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SATZ, Presiding Judge.

This is an action under Rule 27.26. At issue is movant’s plea of guilty to robbery, first degree. The court below denied mov-ant’s Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentia-ry hearing. Movant appeals. We affirm.

Movant was charged with assault, first degree, robbery, first degree and armed criminal action. Apparently, the state agreed to recommend concurrent ten year sentences on the assault and robbery charges and to nolle pros the armed criminal action charge if movant would plead guilty to the assault and robbery. Movant pled guilty to the two charges, and the state entered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Laws v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State v. ParcelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Matthews v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  5. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Rice v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. State v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Spradling v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. State v. BoyleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. BradshawMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API