Boston Woven Hose Co. v. Star Rubber Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
In Equity. Bill for infringement of patent.
1Opinion of the CourtWales, J.
The plea of the defendant, Bell, sets forth that at and before the bringing of this suit, and before the date of the letters patent, No. 361,994, he then was, and now is, the secretary of the Star Rubber Company, and also an officer of the New York Woven Hose Company, and that in such official capacity he then performed and now performs the duties of those offices; that he personally neither owned nor owns, had or has, any interest in the machines described as “circular looms,” which are alleged to infringe said letters patent, either in making, selling, or using them, only in so far as he is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ambler v. ChoteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Smith v. Standard Laundry Machinery Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1883
3Cited by8 opinions
- Powder Power Tool Corporation v. Powder Actuated Tool Company, Inc., and Frank J. KlunkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- Consolidated Fastener Co. v. Columbian Fastener Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1897
- Western Electric Co. v. Home Tel. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · 1898
- Glucose Sugar Refining Co. v. St. Louis Syrup & Preserving Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1905
- Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. RidderU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.