Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Hill

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1935No. 58PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, District Judge.

This case is before the court on a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner contends that two sentences of imprisonment imposed upon him by two different federal District Courts have been served concurrently and that he has completed service of both sentences.

On June 16, 1930, Daniel Hogan, the petitioner herein, was sentenced by the District Court for the Western District of Louisiana to be confined in the United States penitentiary at Atlanta, for a-period of three years and to pay a fine of $5,000, and, in default of the payment of the fine, to be confined an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. MayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. United States v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. WrightDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1944
  2. Hogan v. HillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Crump v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  4. Hogan v. HillDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Kerr v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API