Legal Opinion

Mandel v. Donohue

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Erlanger, J.:

Defaults, whether in pleading or in failing to appear in the various trial parts, are no longer opened as a matter of course. 'The rule is now firmly established that, unless the party against whom the default is taken presents by affidavit facts establishing either a meritorious cause of action or defense, the relief will be denied. The appellate court has also held that a mere affidavit of merits is not sufficient. (Fitzgerald Mfg. Co. v. Alexander, 200 App. Div. 164; Titus v. Halsted, 209 id. 66.) These authorities are evidently unknown to many. The trial justice, as was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fitzgerald Manufacturing Co. v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lunghino v. Marine Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Crouse Grocery Co. v. ValentineNew York Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API