Legal Opinion

State v. Holmes

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1978No. 12407, 12408PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PORTER, Justice.

CASE SUMMARY

Defendant appeals from his two convictions, for grand larceny and burglary, which were entered upon his plea of guilty. He admits participation in the burglary and theft but contends (1) that he was deprived of his right to be informed as to the nature of the charges before making his guilty plea; (2) that he was deprived of his right against self-incrimination because the trial court did not inquire whether his plea was prompted by an illegally obtained confession; and (3) that he was deprived of equal protection and the right to be free from cruel and unusual…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Nachtigall v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Application of GarritsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Stacey v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. GoodwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Lodermeier v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Roseland v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API