Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

COLINS, President Judge.

Employer Metropolitan Edison Company appeals the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the workers’ compensation judge’s (WCJ) grant of partial disability benefits on the basis that claimant sustained his burden of proving a work-related injury. The issue currently before the Court is whether shift work mala-daptation syndrome (SWMS) is a compensa-ble injury under the Workers’ Compensation Act,1 and, if so, whether the applicable burden of proof is that for a physical injury or a mental injury.

Claimant Stephen Werner filed a claim petition…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Bethenergy Mines, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. York Terrace/Beverly Enterprises v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Whiteside v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Volkswagen of America v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API