Slattery v. Godfrey
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This case concerns the upkeep and uninterrupted use on running automobiles of anti-skid chains. The importance of such chains, their lessening the danger of automobile travel, the invention displayed in their development, their wide use, tlieir aggregate commercial value, and the space occupied by eases involving them as reported in patent decisions, all combine to evidence the important place they hold in automobile use. One type of such chains, commonly known as the Weed, entered the field of patent litigation in 1910, and the Putnam patent therefor was held valid…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Excelsior Supply Co. v. Weed Chain Tire Grip Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1911
- Weed Chain Tire Grip Co. v. Excelsior Supply Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1910
- Parsons Non-Skid Co. v. E. J. Willis Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
- Weed Chain Grip Co. v. Atlas Chain Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Julius Levine & Co. v. Automatic Paper Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
- Claypool v. Houston Oil Field Material Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1958
- Slattery v. Johnson Motor Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- Slattery v. Eureka Auto Chain Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1932