Legal Opinion

State v. Coolack

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 7, 1964PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered

Pee CuRIAm.

The question is whether two indictments for murder should be dismissed because defendant allegedly was not afforded a speedy trial. The trial court denied defendant’s motion to dismiss and we granted him leave to appeal.

On December 3, 1949 defendant entered a tavern and in a matter of moments shot Arthur Poole, his wife Irene Poole and Homer Luhman. Arthur and Irene Poole died almost instantly, and Luhman succumbed several months later. Three separate indictments for murder were returned.

Defendant was tried for the murder of Arthur Poole. The…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. LippolisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  2. State v. AshbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  3. State v. GaffeySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  4. State v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. State v. BrockingtonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API