Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dyal v. Brunt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1942No. 35,437Published

1ConcurrenceHarvey, J.

Having written the opinion of the court, naturally I concur in it and would write no more if it were not for the new questions raised by the concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Allen which, after quoting from the will, is predicated upon the assertion: “It is clear that the widow was given the power to dispose of the property by deed or by will. . . . The real question then is whether a gift over on intestacy is good.” I think this opinion should not have been written, for two reasons:

First, the widow did not leave á will; the questions whether she was given power by the will of her husband to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cochran v. GrooverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. Carpenter v. LothringerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  3. Phillipson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. Masterson v. MastersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. Smith v. JudgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API