Armstrong v. Alabama Power Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:
In these cases, appellant raises important questions about the allocation of jurisdiction between federal and state courts in removal cases and about the justiciability of anticipatory claims for contribution and indemnity. Specifically, appellant asks this Court to decide when a defendant may remove a maritime “saving to suitors” case to federal court; appellant also asks us to determine when a contribution and indemnity suit in anticipation of liability becomes ripe for adjudication. For the reasons discussed below, we agree with the district courts’ answers to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Waco v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- A/s J. Ludwig Mowinckles Rederi v. Tidewater Construction Corporation, Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Gearbulk, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Southeast Mortgage Co. v. MullinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
3Cited by53 opinions
- Kwame Ajamu v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Pelleport Investors, Inc. v. Budco Quality Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Victor C. Baris v. Sulpicio Lines, Inc., Caltex Petroleum, Inc., Caltex Petroleum Corporation, and Caltex Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Aquamar S.A. v. Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- Lincoln House, Inc. v. Paul W. DupreCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.