Legal Opinion

Penland v. Greene

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 29, 1976No. 83PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Justice.

On several occasions during the course of the trial, the judge allowed motions to strike certain testimony and the jury was told on each occasion to disregard that testimony and not consider it in their deliberations. In his final instructions to the jury the judge said:. . . The Court will again instruct you that when it has instructed you to disregard testimony, disabuse it from your mind not to consider it. Please follow those instructions in your deliberations.

Defendant strenuously argues that the second and third “it” in the first sentence quoted above refer to the judge’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. BarnhillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Warren v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Galloway v. HartmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Wrenn v. WatersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Kirkman v. WillardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Whisnant v. HerreraCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Cicogna v. HolderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. Vandiver v. VandiverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Daisy v. YostCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. Bledsole v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API