Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Randolph

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2002No. Docket 117750, 118078Published

1DissentMarkman, J.

I respectfully dissent. In affirming the Court of Appeals, the majority concludes that this Court has never adopted the “transactional approach” to robbery. Ante at 540. The majority then proceeds *554to overrule more than thirty years of precedent in the Court of Appeals applying this view. In doing so, the majority states that “the force used to accomplish the taking underlying a charge of unarmed robbery must be contemporaneous with the taking.” Ante at 536. The majority concludes that defendant in this case “did not accomplish his taking by use of force, violence, assault, or putting in…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. People v. NowackMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hoste v. Shanty Creek Management, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Commonwealth v. MoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Briley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  5. People v. PodolskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1952

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API