State v. Quinn
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Marshall District Court. The defendant in each case was separately indicted and convicted of the crime of nuisance in keeping and maintaining a saloon, and in selling therein intoxicating liquors. Each separately prosecutes an appeal in his case.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
No counsel appear for the defendants in these cases, and no assignment of error, or argument in any form, has been made in any one of them. In the absence of an assignment of error and of argument iu criminal cases, we are required to examine the record and render such judgment upon it as the law demands. Code, § 4538. See cases cited in Miller’s Code. This we have done in the cases before us. A careful consideration of the record in each case reveals no errors demanding the reversal of the judgment of the district court.
In the absence of an assignment of error, and of argument, pointing out…
2Cited by1 opinion
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896