Legal Opinion · Dissent

General Dynamics Corporation v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 15, 1963No. 258-62Published

1DissentDavis, Judge

Though for me the result is not plain either way, I conclude that we should take Congress at its word when it provided without qualification, in Section 1601(d) of the 1939 Code,1 that “[n]o interest shall be allowed or paid on the amount of any such credit or refund.” 58 Stat. 78. The two sentences of this subsection form a specific provision dealing, I think, with all situations like that before us— any refund of federal tax directly connected with and attributable to a credit for the amounts paid (or creditable) to the states. This provision does not make any express distinction between a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Skinner v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1934
  2. Albert & J. M. Anderson Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API