Legal Opinion

Forbes v. Board of Health

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion. Motion to disndss appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Mabry, J.:

In September, 1888, appellant, D. S. Forbes, master of the British bark “Tiber,” sued the Board of Health of Escambia county, a corporation existing under the laws of Florida, for $2,000 damages for detaining said bark for the space of twelve days, and compelling her to undergo and pay the cost of fumigation, and the discharge of her ballast at a quarantine station under an order and proclamation of said board made on the 23d day of April, 1888.

• A demurrer to the declaration was sustained by the court below on the 22d day of October, 1888, with leave for complainant below to amend…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United Hebrew Benevolent Ass'n v. BenshimolMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  2. Fullerton v. SpringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1854
  3. State v. GumberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Laude v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
  5. State v. WishNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. FoxworthSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
  2. McKibben v. MallorySupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  3. People v. LowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Nicholson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Allgood v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API