Legal Opinion

Westfall v. Whittaker, Clark & Daniels, Metropolitan Talc Co.

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided September 7, 1983No. C.A. 79-0269BPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANCIS J. BOYLE, Chief Judge.

This civil action is presently before the Court on objections of the Plaintiff and Defendant Windsor Minerals, Inc. (hereinafter Windsor) to the Magistrate’s report and recommendations as to the Motions for Summary Judgment of Defendant Omya, Inc. (hereinafter Omya) and Defendant Windsor. The Magistrate recommended that Defendant Omya’s Motion for Summary Judgment be granted, and that Defendant Windsor’s be denied. The issue, pared down to its simplest form, is whether Plaintiff’s claims against these two Defendants are time barred.

A brief chronology of…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Wilkinson v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1968
  3. William Danzer & Co. v. Gulf & Ship Island RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. Berthiaume v. SCHOOL COM. OF CITY OF WOONSOCKETSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brennan v. Lermer Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1986
  2. Souza v. Erie Strayer Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  3. Burgos Martinez v. Rivera OrtizDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1989
  4. Denny v. HintonDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1986
  5. Grossi v. the Miriam Hospital, 93-4150 (1998)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API