Legal Opinion

Gertsma v. City of Berea

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1999No. 74063PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Patton, Judge.

Plaintiffs Laurence and Mildred Gertsma, landlords of two separate eight-unit apartment buildings in Berea, brought this declaratory judgment action against the city of Berea, challenging the constitutionality of Berea Codified Ordinance No. 90-117. That ordinance requires owners of commercial buildings and apartment buildings with more than four units to arrange for and pay for private trash collection. Plaintiffs claimed that the ordinance violated their rights to equal protection under the law; the city claimed that the ordinance was a legitimate cost-cutting effort. Both…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Clements v. FashingSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. Sterling, Unpublished Decision (11-10-2005)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API