Legal Opinion

Nixon v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 9, 1997No. 1184-96PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON APPELLANTS PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Per curiam

Appellant was indicted for the felony offense of possession of a controlled substance. The trial judge conducted a pre-trial hearing on appellant’s motion to suppress and denied the motion. Upon appellant’s plea of not guilty, the State introduced a written stipulation of evidence and the trial judge found appellant guilty. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Nixon v. State, 928 S.W.2d 208 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1996). We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine the correctness of that decision.

Subsequently, the State…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nixon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1996

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Loera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2000
  2. Collins v. DotsonDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API