Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stann v. Ford Motor Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1960No. Docket 8, Calendar 48,260PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1DissentBlack, J.

This case presents an oft-mooted question of procedure on motion to dismiss. Where at law the declaration on its face states a reasonably-informed cause of action (see Court Rule No 19, § 1 [1945]), or where in equity the bill within its 4 corners exhibits a case cognizable by equity, may 'the court hearing a defendant’s motion to dismiss utilize an ex parte affidavit of the moving party for the purpose of determining the truth or falsity of some pivotal allegation of the attacked pleading? I say “No.” The question recently and correspondingly was before us in Mathews v. United Association,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Parker v. Port Huron HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Schulte v. American Box Board Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Dodge v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Prawdzik v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Mathews v. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry of United States & CanadaMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Landry v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Furness v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Cibor v. Oakwood HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. Binder v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Guardiola v. Oakwood HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API