Stann v. Ford Motor Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1DissentBlack, J.
This case presents an oft-mooted question of procedure on motion to dismiss. Where at law the declaration on its face states a reasonably-informed cause of action (see Court Rule No 19, § 1 [1945]), or where in equity the bill within its 4 corners exhibits a case cognizable by equity, may 'the court hearing a defendant’s motion to dismiss utilize an ex parte affidavit of the moving party for the purpose of determining the truth or falsity of some pivotal allegation of the attacked pleading? I say “No.” The question recently and correspondingly was before us in Mathews v. United Association,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Parker v. Port Huron HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Schulte v. American Box Board Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Dodge v. Detroit Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Prawdzik v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Mathews v. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry of United States & CanadaMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Landry v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Furness v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- Cibor v. Oakwood HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Binder v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- Guardiola v. Oakwood HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.