Legal Opinion

Waldrep v. Goodwin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 6, 1971No. 26438PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Undercofler, Justice.

The issue here is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict to probate the will of Lemma Waldrep. Appellant, caveator in the trial court, is the husband of the testatrix. Propounder is the testatrix’ only living child to whom the entire estate is devised except as stated in item III, "I am fully knowledgeable of my husband, Hubert C. Waldrep, but I will and bequeath him only my best wishes and $1 (one) dollar. Due to circumstances and conditions and events of the past it is my desire arid will that he receive only my best wishes and the $1 (one) dollar. I…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brumbelow v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Thompson v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Huff v. HuffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1871
  4. Bianchini v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  5. Crawford v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Waldrep v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Cornelius v. CrosbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. Sauls v. ESTATE OF NORMA F. AVANTCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  4. Miles v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  5. Beck v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API