Legal Opinion

Agnone v. Home-Owners Insurance Company

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 19, 2015No. Docket 320196PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

In this dispute over first-party benefits under Michigan’s no-fault act, defendant, HomeOwners Insurance Company, appeals by leave granted the trial court’s order denying its motion for partial summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10). On appeal, Home-Owners argues that the trial court erred when it determined that plaintiff, John Agnone, was entitled to work-loss benefits under the no-fault act even though the undisputed evidence showed that his income after the accident exceeded the statutory maximum. We conclude that the trial court erred when it determined that the statutory maximum…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Johnson v. ReccaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Barnard Manufacturing Co. v. Gates Performance Engineering, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Marquis v. Hartford Accident & IndemnityMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Popma v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Monroe Cnty. Prosecutor v. Spears (In re Spears)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Gavril Miclea v. Cherokee Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Marina Soliman v. Hung Quoc DinhMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Michigan Head & Spine Institute Pc v. Mich Assigned Claims PlanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API