Legal Opinion

Richards v. Superior Court of S.F.

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1904No. Crim. No. 1202PublishedCited by 6 opinions

PETITION for Writ of Mandate against the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. William P. Lawlor, Judge, and Platt B. Elderkin, Phonographic Reporter. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an original petition for a writ of mandate against the respondents, the Hon. W. P. Lawlor, judge of the superior court, and Platt B. Elderkin, his official phonographic reporter. The application for a writ is based upon the provisions of section 269 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as follows: “ Such reporter, or any one of them, where there are two or more, must, at the request of either party, or of the court in a civil action or proceeding, and on the order of the court, the district attorney, or the attorney for defendant in a criminal action or proceeding, take down in shorthand…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Preston v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Teeple v. State ex rel. BowerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Greene v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Svoboda v. PurkittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API