Legal Opinion

State v. Duran

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 21, 2019No. 119303PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Arnold-Burger, C.J.:

*1268 If the district court finds "with particularity" that intermediate sanctions would jeopardize public safety or that the welfare of the offender will not be served by the *1269 imposition of intermediate sanctions, the district court may order the offender who has violated probation to serve his or her underlying sentence. K.S.A. 2018 Supp. 22-3716. But the court's order must state the reasons for its findings with particularity. The district court's findings are not specific enough to bypass intermediate sanctions if an appellate court must infer from the judge's findings the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MarshallSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. State v. DooleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  3. State v. ClappSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  4. State v. McFeetersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  5. State v. HuskeyCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. TafollaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. State of KerrCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021
  3. State v. BurnettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  4. State v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  5. State v. CombsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2021

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API