Legal Opinion

McNeil v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 25, 2008No. 2D07-4732PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Elliot Antonio McNeil appeals the post-conviction court’s order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). To resolve Mr. McNeil’s claim requires factual determinations that are not apparent from the face of the record. Therefore, this claim may not be raised by a rule 3.800(a) motion. See Blocker v. State, 968 So.2d 686 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted, 973 So.2d 1119, No. SC07-2292, 2007 WL 4864232 (Fla. Dec. 21, 2007).

Accordingly, we affirm the postconviction court’s denial order without prejudice to any right Mr. McNeil…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blocker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Blocker v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. BRYANT ALLEN CODY v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  3. Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  4. Mosier v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. WILLLIE HARRIS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API