Lester v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1DissentDysart, J.
hi concur in that portion of the majority opinion which affirms the awards of damages for increased risk of cancer.
I also concur in the awards for medical monitoring but on a different basis than that expressed in the majority opinion. In reviewing a factfinder’s conclusions with regard to special damages, an appellate court must satisfy a two-prong test based on the record as a whole: There must be no reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s conclusions, and the finding must be clearly wrong. Lester v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 10-743, p. 13 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/31/12), 102 So.3d 148, 159, writ…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Bourgeois v. AP Green Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Billiot v. BP Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Bonnette v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.