Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lester v. Exxon Mobil Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 26, 2013No. 2012-CA-1709Published

1DissentDysart, J.

hi concur in that portion of the majority opinion which affirms the awards of damages for increased risk of cancer.

I also concur in the awards for medical monitoring but on a different basis than that expressed in the majority opinion. In reviewing a factfinder’s conclusions with regard to special damages, an appellate court must satisfy a two-prong test based on the record as a whole: There must be no reasonable factual basis for the trial court’s conclusions, and the finding must be clearly wrong. Lester v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 10-743, p. 13 (La.App. 5 Cir. 5/31/12), 102 So.3d 148, 159, writ…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cole v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Austin v. Abney Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  3. Bourgeois v. AP Green Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  4. Billiot v. BP Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. Bonnette v. Conoco, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API