Legal Opinion

Trustees System Reinco Co. v. Skorcz

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided June 24, 1933No. 4899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSparks, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above).

Appellant contends that the court erred in entering the restraining order because: (1) The note, assignment of wages, and notice of such assignment, under the law of Illinois, created a lien on the wages of bankrupt after adjudication, when and as such wages were earned, and that lien was not discharge-able in bankruptey; (2) the wages included in the restraining order constituted no part of bankrupt’s estate, and appellant had instituted no suit of any kind for their recovery prior to the issuance of the order, nor had it made any threat to collect the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Williams v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Board of Trade of Chicago v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Guffey v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Neves v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1852

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Local Loan Co. v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933
  2. In Re SkorczCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API