Legal Opinion

N.M.R. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 8, 1998No. 97-1303Published

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellant, N.M.R., timely appeals a ninety-day sentence for indirect criminal contempt. This case arose when appellee, state, charged appellant, born on September 2, *1461978, in a petition for delinquency with accessory after the fact. The trial court committed appellant to a restrictiveness level two for the offense. On April 22, 1997, appellee filed a petition for order to show cause why appellant, then age eighteen, should not be held in contempt for failing to complete the court-ordered sanctions and for failing to comply with the community control officers’ orders. The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. AA v. RolleSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. B.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. L.M. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  4. G.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. N.T. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API