Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Shapiro

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 9, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Harry G. Herman, S.

The proponent has applied at the foot of the probate decree for an order charging the objectant personally with the amount of costs to be allowed to proponent in this contested probate proceeding. The probate decree contained a provision permitting application to be made at the foot of the decree after the decree had become final.

In the early case of Matter of Castles (2 N. Y. S. 638) the test of discretion was stated to be dependent upon “ evidence of the *196good faith of the contestant, and a fair prospect of his success that will convince the mind of any intelligent lawyer…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re the Probate of the Will of CoddingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. In re the Estate of RogersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1926
  3. In re the Probate of the Will of CoddingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. In re the Estate of ShapiroNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
  5. In re the Estate of RobertsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of BehrendtNew York Surrogate's Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API