Legal Opinion · Dissent

Johnson v. Dunnings

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 1, 1957No. 5-1230Published

1DissentSam Robinson, Associate Justice

It is agreed that in construing a will the courts should seek to ascertain the intention of the testator as shown by the entire will. In my opinion, the will in the case at bar shows that it was the intention of the testator that Gwendolyn Johnson, his granddaughter, should receive that part of the estate which her father, Odis M. Dunnings, would have received had he been living. The will was executed about four months after the death of Odis M. Dunnings. The second paragraph of the will provides: “I give, devise and bequeath to Gwendolyn Johnson, the daughter of my son, Odis M. Dunnings, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Soper v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Adams v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API