Legal Opinion
Twemo Corp. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 14, 1938No. 7470PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
The three Fairchild patents in suit are all in the automobile tire art and relate specifically to machines for vulcanizing inner tubes by what is called the full molding process.
The plaintiffs are the inventor, Walter L. Fairchild, and his exclusive licensee. The defendant, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, is a user of the alleged infringing apparatus, and the defendant, National Rubber Machinery Company, is its manufacturer. The patents are reissue No. 16,-542, granted February 8, 1927, original filed December 10, 1921, No. 1,773,810, granted August 26, 1930, and No.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Fur Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
- Detroit Stoker Co. v. Brownell Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1937
- Dillon Pulley Co. v. McEachranCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Jones v. General Fireproofing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blanc v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Remington Rand, Inc. v. Meilink Steel Safe Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944