Legal Opinion

Cox v. Malone

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 24, 2002No. 00 CIV. 8355(SAS)PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Pro se plaintiff Keith Cox brings suit under Title 42, United States Code, section 1983 (“1983”) for excessive use of force during a pat down frisk and for violation of his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights in connection with a disciplinary hearing. Defendants Deputy Superintendent of Administrative Services Sharon Hornbeck and Correction Officer Paul J. Simms 1 now move for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is granted.

II. FACTS

In 1999, Cox was…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lipton v. County of Orange, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  2. Ligon v. DohertyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
  3. Scott v. GardnerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  4. McBean v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  5. Lloyd v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API