Legal Opinion
Riback v. Prudence Company, Inc.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided July 13, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.
The action is upon a written guaranty of payment of four bonds. The maker of the bonds is not a party to the action, nor does the plaintiff seek to recover upon the bonds. The bonds were made by the Prudence Bonds Corporation, a separate and distinct entity, and not the defendant herein. These were first mortgage collateral bonds, each in the sum of $100, and payable January 1, 1932, with interest at five and one-half per cent per annum, payable January first and July first of each year. On the reverse side of each bond is the written guaranty of the defendant which is the basis of this…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Klinke v. SamuelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Weisel v. Hagdahl Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Fieber v. CardassiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Realty Associates Securities Corp. v. Twelve Thirty Five Park Avenue Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1933
3Cited by4 opinions
- Howley v. RomagnaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935
- First Trust Co. v. MaxcyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- Riback v. BroderickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- Rolfe v. WalkerNew York Supreme Court · 1946