Legal Opinion

Blalock v. Corley

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 4, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00647Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KAREL BLALOCK, : No. 3:24-CV-0647 Plaintiff : 3 (Judge Munley) Vv. ; LT. CORELY, et al., Defendants : MEMORANDUM Plaintiff Karel Blalock initiated the above-captioned pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983," alleging that multiple officials at the State Correctional Institution Huntingdon (SCI Huntingdon) failed to protect him from an inmate assault. Upor required screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), the court will dismiss in part Blalock’s complaint. I. BACKGROUND At all relevant times to the instant lawsuit, Blalock…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API