Blalock v. Corley
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KAREL BLALOCK, : No. 3:24-CV-0647 Plaintiff : 3 (Judge Munley) Vv. ; LT. CORELY, et al., Defendants : MEMORANDUM Plaintiff Karel Blalock initiated the above-captioned pro se action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983," alleging that multiple officials at the State Correctional Institution Huntingdon (SCI Huntingdon) failed to protect him from an inmate assault. Upor required screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), the court will dismiss in part Blalock’s complaint. I. BACKGROUND At all relevant times to the instant lawsuit, Blalock…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.