Legal Opinion

City of Richmond v. Gentry

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 9, 1910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of the city of Richmond in an action of trespass on the- case. Judgment for the plaintiff against the city of Richmond. City of Richmond assigns error.

1Opinion of the Court

Keith, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action by the defendant in error, Alice Gentry, against the city of Richmond, to recover damages for an injury sustained by a fall caused by the unsafe condition of the sidewalk in said city.

By an act approved February 3, 1900 (Acts 1899-1900, p. 288), it is provided, that “in any action against the city to recover damages against it, for any negligence in the construction and maintenance of its streets, alleys or parks, where any person is liable with the city for such negligence, every such person shall be joined as defendant with the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Norfolk v. AnthonySupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  2. City of Richmond v. RoseSupreme Court of Virginia · 1920
  3. City of Richmond v. LambertSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  4. City of Norfolk v. TravisCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1927
  5. Corbin v. City of HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API