Legal Opinion

Graber v. Fuqua

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 2009No. 05-0303PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green

in which Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice HECHT, Justice O’NEILL, and Justice JOHNSON joined.

The question in this case is whether a state malicious prosecution claim is *610preempted by the federal bankruptcy regime simply because the claim arose out of the filing of an adversary action in a bankruptcy proceeding. We hold that under the facts of this case, Congress did not intend for such a claim to be preempted.

In a Texas trial court, Richard Fuqua alleged that Thomas Graber and Hopkins & Sutter had committed the common law tort of malicious prosecution by initiating an adversary proceeding in…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Unifund CCR Partners v. VillaTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. MCI Sales and Service, Inc. v. HintonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Black v. Washington Mutual Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  4. York v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Brockert v. WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API