Graber v. Fuqua
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Green
in which Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice HECHT, Justice O’NEILL, and Justice JOHNSON joined.
The question in this case is whether a state malicious prosecution claim is *610preempted by the federal bankruptcy regime simply because the claim arose out of the filing of an adversary action in a bankruptcy proceeding. We hold that under the facts of this case, Congress did not intend for such a claim to be preempted.
In a Texas trial court, Richard Fuqua alleged that Thomas Graber and Hopkins & Sutter had committed the common law tort of malicious prosecution by initiating an adversary proceeding in…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Unifund CCR Partners v. VillaTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- MCI Sales and Service, Inc. v. HintonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Black v. Washington Mutual Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
- York v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Brockert v. WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.