Pollock's Estate
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Deew,
In this case each side appealed. The decision of a single question in the negative will settle both appeals, but an answer in the affirmative will require passing upon another question, to wit, the proper measure of damage. The question is: Did the will of James Pollock create a trust in his son of certain stock for his widow? The lower court, by a vote of three to two, answered this question in the affirmative, and surcharged the alleged trustee with certain stock in specie.
James Pollock was a well-known citizen of Philadelphia. For fifty years prior to his death…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kirkpatrick's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Stewart's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- McCullough's Estate (No. 2)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Etter v. GreenawaltSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
- Heckman's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Vaira v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
- Flagg EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Prime's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Brubaker v. LauverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- McDonald v. MungerNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.