Legal Opinion

Zeisler v. Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. (In Re Grambling)

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 24, 1988No. 19-30265PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON OBJECTIONS UNDER CODE § 546(a)(1) TO MOTION TO AMEND A COMPLAINT

ALAN H. W. SHIFF, Bankruptcy Judge.

The plaintiff, interim trustee, 1 seeks to amend his complaint in each of the above adversary proceedings to add additional causes of action. Both defendants object, asserting that the causes of action are barred by the two year limitation period under Code § 546(a)(1). The dispositive issue here is whether that time bar applies to the appointment of a trustee under one of the Code sections designated by 546(a) or the appointment of a trustee under any one of those…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stuart v. Pingree (In Re Afco Development Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1986
  2. Smith v. Moody (In Re Moody)District Court, S.D. Texas · 1987

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. White v. Boston (In Re White)District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1989
  2. Ford v. Union Bank (In re San Joaquin Roast Beef)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Steege v. Lyons (In Re Lyons)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
  4. Dumas v. Research Testing Lab, Inc. (In Re EPI Products USA, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1993
  5. Martino v. ASSCO Associates, Inc. (In Re SSS Enterprises, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API