Legal Opinion

State v. Marley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 1988No. 315A87PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EXUM, Chief Justice.

Defendant’s assignments of error pertain to: (1) whether the trial court’s instructions to the jury included a constitutionally impermissible presumption on an essential element of the offense; (2) whether the trial judge erred in finding in aggravation that the offense was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel, N.C.G.S. § 15A-1340.4(a)(l )f; and (3) whether there was error in the trial court’s finding in aggravation at the sentencing hearing that defendant acted with premeditation and deliberation, defendant having been acquitted by the jury of first degree murder. We…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. State v. PimentalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. State v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API