State v. Marley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EXUM, Chief Justice.
Defendant’s assignments of error pertain to: (1) whether the trial court’s instructions to the jury included a constitutionally impermissible presumption on an essential element of the offense; (2) whether the trial judge erred in finding in aggravation that the offense was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel, N.C.G.S. § 15A-1340.4(a)(l )f; and (3) whether there was error in the trial court’s finding in aggravation at the sentencing hearing that defendant acted with premeditation and deliberation, defendant having been acquitted by the jury of first degree murder. We…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Coffin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Hankerson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. HankersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- State v. PimentalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.