Legal Opinion

Doroshow v. Ott

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 23, 1905No. 48PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Petition for Revision of Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, Circuit Judge.

This case comes before us upon petition for revision in matter of law of certain proceedings had in the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey, in bankruptcy. The petition alleges that, on December 28, 1903, the petitioner, Doroshow, purchased of Morris Glickman certain store goods; that afterwards, in the month of January, 1904, proceedings in bankruptcy were begun against Morris Glickman in the said Dis*741trict Court, in which S. Conrad Ott was, upon petition of creditors, appointed receiver, and thereupon the said Ott took into his possession,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Freeman v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
  2. Lathrop v. DrakeSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Rouse v. LetcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. In re RussellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900
  5. In re BaudouineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kirkpatrick v. HarnesbergerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API