Stamey v. Barkley
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 18, Oct. T., 1904, by plaintiff, from judgment of O. P. Indiana Co., June T., 1908, No. 140, on verdict for defendant in issue framed between W. H. Stanley, J. C. King and E. D. Carter as plaintiffs and W. F. Barkley as defendant. Issue to quiet title to coal lands. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Errors assigned are set forth in the opinion of the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Brown,
This proceeding was instituted by the appellee under the Act of June 10, 1893, P. L. 415, for the purpose of quieting title to coal land of which he ivas the legal owner. On the presentation of his petition to the court, setting forth that the appellants disputed and denied his right to the land and asserted a right in themselves to it by virtue of a certain written agreement, a rule was granted to show cause why an issue should “ not be framed by the court to test and determine the respective rights of the petitioner and W. H. Stamey, J. C. King and E. D. Carter,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coleman's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
- Bair & Gazzam, Lim. v. HubarttSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Lehigh Valley Insurance v. FullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1876
- Schrimpton v. BertoletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
3Cited by15 opinions
- Williams Et Ux. v. MeredithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Frank P. Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Hughes v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Boocks's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Kimmel v. ShafferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.