Legal Opinion

Salcido v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 1934No. 16587Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge. —

The only point urged in appellant’s motion for rehearing to which we think it necessary to advert is his contention that we were wrong in our holding that if the court below committed error in admitting in evidence that part of Marquez’s confession which recited that the property stolen by him had been delivered to appellant, the error was harmless in as much as appellant himself testified that he received the property from Marquez.

Supporting our holding are many authorities, some being Wagner v. State, 53 Texas Crim. Rep., 306, 109 S. W., 169;…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Wagner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. MacHado v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Reusch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Maladin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API