Peters v. Reading
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Linn,
The only question is whether the appellant city may withdraw and discontinue condemnation proceedings in the circumstances disclosed by the record.
The right of eminent domain is an attribute of sovereignty, inherent in the State, to be exercised subject to applicable provisions of the Constitution and in accord with statutes regulating procedure. It is generally exercised by the State, or by agencies to which the State delegates the power, such as municipal corporations and others sometimes designated quasi-public corporations.
It has been held that, in the absence…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pittsburgh's PetitionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Weiss v. Bor. of South Bethlehem, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Northampton County1890
- Myers v. Borough of South BethlehemSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
- Wood v. Trustees of State Hospital for the InsaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Interstate Cemetery Co. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Condemnation of 110 Washington Street Ex Rel. Redevelopment Authority of MontgomeryCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Jury v. WiestSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Mott v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- In re Condemnation by the City of Coatesville of Certain Properties & Property Interests for Use as a Public Golf Course, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.