Legal Opinion

Robert Steinbuch, Esq. And Ben Motal, Esq., on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated v. Pulaski County Circuit Court Eric Higgins, in His Official Capacity as Pulaski County Sheriff And Barry Hyde, in His Official Capacity as Pulaski County Judge

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 13, 2024PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2024 Ark. 84

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-24-295 Opinion Delivered: May 13, 2024 ROBERT STEINBUCH, ESQ.; AND BEN MOTAL, ESQ., ON BEHALF OF PETITIONERS’ PETITION FOR A WRIT OF THEMSELVES AND ALL PERSONS MANDAMUS, REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED SIMILARLY SITUATED CONSIDERATION, AND REQUEST FOR PETITIONERS REMOVAL OF THE TRIAL JUDGE V. PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT; ERIC HIGGINS, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PULASKI COUNTY SHERIFF; AND BARRY HYDE, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PULASKI COUNTY JUDGE RESPONDENTS ORDER. PER CURIAM A petition for writ of mandamus, request for expedited consideration,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parker v. CrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  2. Walls v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Weaver v. City of West HelenaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Willis v. CrumblySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robert Steinbuch, Esq. And Ben Motal, Esq., on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated v. Pulaski County Circuit Court Eric Higgins, in His Official Capacity as Pulaski County Sheriff And Barry Hyde, in His Official Capacity as Pulaski County JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API