Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Eufaula Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 11, 1934No. 22171PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

Eufaula Motor Company, a corporation, hereinafter called plaintiff, instituted an action in the district court of McIntosh county, Okla., against J. A. Montgomery, hereinafter called defendant, secured a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant brought this appeal.

The plaintiff sought a money judgment upon a promissory note, and the possession of an automobile for the purpose of fore closing a chattel mortgage upon it. The automobile was replevinecl by the plaintiff, but was reclaimed by the defendant, by redelivery bond.

The first answer filed June 23, 1930, by the defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  2. Kerr v. McKinneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Nachtsheim v. BartleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Summerall v. Covington Bros. Farm Loan & Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Briggs v. McAdams Pipe & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
  2. King v. HancockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API